Citation

Ashby NJ, Glöckner A, Dickert S. Front. Psychol. 2011; 2(online): 261.

Affiliation

Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Bonn, Germany.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Frontiers Research Foundation)

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00261

PMID

22013429

PMCID

PMC3189625

Abstract

Daily we make decisions ranging from the mundane to the seemingly pivotal that shape our lives. Assuming rationality, all relevant information about one's options should be thoroughly examined in order to make the best choice. However, some findings suggest that under specific circumstances thinking too much has disadvantageous effects on decision quality and that it might be best to let the unconscious do the busy work. In three studies we test the capacity assumption and the appropriate weighting principle of Unconscious Thought Theory using a classic risky choice paradigm and including a "deliberation with information" condition. Although we replicate an advantage for unconscious thought (UT) over "deliberation without information," we find that "deliberation with information" equals or outperforms UT in risky choices. These results speak against the generality of the assumption that UT has a higher capacity for information integration and show that this capacity assumption does not hold in all domains. Furthermore, we show that "deliberate thought with information" leads to more differentiated knowledge compared to UT which speaks against the generality of the appropriate weighting assumption.

Language: en