SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Holmes SD, Roberts B. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2011; 37(6): 1975.

Affiliation

Psychology, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/a0026334

PMID

22122160

Abstract

Reports an error in "The influence of adaptation and inhibition on the effects of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping" by Stephen D. Holmes and Brian Roberts (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Advanced Online Publication, Oct 3, 2011, np). In six instances the symbol "/ε/" was incorrectly displayed as "/E/"; in one instance the symbol "/ε/" was incorrectly displayed as "/e/"; and in two instances the symbol "/Ι/" was incorrectly displayed as "/i/." All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2011-22483-001.) Onset asynchrony is an important cue for auditory scene analysis. For example, a harmonic of a vowel that begins before the other components contributes less to the perceived phonetic quality. This effect was thought primarily to involve high-level grouping processes, because the contribution can be partly restored by accompanying the leading portion of the harmonic (precursor) with a synchronous captor tone an octave higher, and hence too remote to influence adaptation of the auditory-nerve response to that harmonic. However, recent work suggests that this restoration effect arises instead from inhibitory interactions relatively early in central auditory processing. The experiments reported here have reevaluated the role of adaptation in grouping by onset asynchrony and explored further the inhibitory account of the restoration effect. Varying the frequency of the precursor in the range ± 10% relative to the vowel harmonic (Experiment 1), or introducing a silent interval from 0 to 320 ms between the precursor and the vowel (Experiment 2), both produce effects on vowel quality consistent with those predicted from peripheral adaptation or recovery from it. However, there were some listeners for whom even the smallest gap largely eliminated the effect of the precursor. Consistent with the inhibitory account of the restoration effect, a contralateral pure tone whose frequency is close to that of the precursor is highly effective at restoring the contribution of the asynchronous harmonic (Experiment 3). When the frequencies match, lateralization cues arising from binaural fusion of the precursor and contralateral tone may also contribute to this restoration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved).


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print