Citation

Hofferberth B, Hirschberg, Grotemeyer. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 1986; 332: 105-111.

Erratum On

Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1988 Feb;77(2):240

Copyright

(Copyright © 1986, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2883817

Abstract

Eye movements are classified into two categories: quickly running saccades and smooth pursuit movements. Saccades are fast conjugate eye movements with a preprogrammed direction, amplitude, and speed course; their purpose is to register new objects in the visual field. The duration and velocity of saccadic eye movements are very much dependent on vigilance. Comparisons were made with a number of psychometric tests [d 2 Durchstreichtest (cross out test), Viennese determination apparatus, and flicker fusion frequency] and the velocity of fast eye movements. The results of three separate investigations are presented. Standardization was undertaken in 100 healthy volunteers, 50 male and 50 female subjects aged between 20 and more than 50 years were included. In an open parallel group study, comparisons were made between various hypnotics with different half-lives (temazepam, flunitrazepam, flurazepam, and phenobarbital). There were 10 healthy volunteers in each group, and medication was taken as a single night-time dose for 7 nights. In a double-blind study, temazepam (20 mg/day) was tested against flunitrazepam (2 mg/day). Dosing lasted 7 days. A marked impairment of the saccadic eye movements was observed with flunitrazepam but not with temazepam. Of all the benzodiazepines tested, only temazepam had no influence on the parameters of the saccade test. These results can be explained by temazepam's short half-life and also by the fact that no active metabolites are formed.

Language: en