Citation

Alemany S, Ayesa-Arriola R, Arias B, Fatjó-Vilas M, Ibáñez MI, Ortet G, Crespo-Facorro B, Faňanás L. Eur. Psychiatry 2014; 30(1): 38-42.

Affiliation

Anthropology Unit, Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona and Biomedicine Institute of the University of Barcelona (IBUB), Diagonal, 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research Network on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.08.005

PMID

25284334

Abstract

GOAL: The present study aimed to examine the prevalence of child abuse across the continuum of psychosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 198 individuals divided in three groups: (1) 48 FEP patients, (2) 77 individuals scoring high in Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE), classified as "High CAPE" group and (3) 73 individuals scoring low, classified as "Low CAPE" group. Childhood abuse was assessed using self-report instruments. Chi(2) tests and logistic regression models controlling by sex, age and cannabis were used to perform three comparisons: (i) FEP vs. Low CAPE; (ii) FEP vs. High CAPE and (iii) High CAPE vs. Low CAPE.

RESULTS: The frequency of individuals exposed to childhood abuse for FEP, High CAPE and Low CAPE groups were 52.1%, 41.6% and 11%, respectively. FEP and High CAPE group presented significantly higher rates of childhood abuse compared to Low CAPE group, however, no significant differences were found between FEP and High CAPE groups regarding the frequency of childhood abuse.

CONCLUSION: There is an increasing frequency of childhood abuse from low subclinical psychosis to FEP patients. However, childhood abuse is equally common in FEP and at risk individuals.

Language: en