SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Belletier C, Davranche K, Tellier IS, Dumas F, Vidal F, Hasbroucq T, Huguet P. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2015; 22(5): 1410-1416.

Affiliation

Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive (LPC) & Fédération de Recherche 3C, Aix-Marseille Université and CNRS, 3 Place Victor Hugo, Case 32, 13331, Marseille, Cedex 3, France, clement.belletier@univ-amu.fr.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Psychonomic Society Publications)

DOI

10.3758/s13423-015-0804-9

PMID

25673216

Abstract

Performing more poorly given one's skill level ("choking") is likely in situations that offer an incentive if a certain outcome is achieved (outcome pressure) or when one is being watched by others-especially when one's performance is being evaluated (monitoring pressure). According to the choking literature, outcome pressure is associated with reduced executive control of attention, whereas monitoring pressure is associated with increased, yet counterproductive, attention to skill processes. Here, we show the first evidence that monitoring pressure-being watched by the experimenter-may lead individuals with higher working memory to choke on a classic measure of executive control-just the task effect thought to result from outcome pressure. Not only does this finding help refine our understanding of the processes underlying choking under monitoring pressure, but it also leads to a new look at classic audience effects, with an important implication for experimental psychology.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print