SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Liu Y, Hu H, Jones JA, Guo Z, Li W, Chen X, Liu P, Liu H. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2015; 42(3): 1895-1904.

Affiliation

Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, 510006, Guangzhou, China.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/ejn.12949

PMID

25969928

Abstract

Speakers rapidly adjust their ongoing vocal productions to compensate for errors they hear in their auditory feedback. It is currently unclear what role attention plays in these vocal compensations. This event-related potential (ERP) study examined the influence of selective and divided attention on the vocal and cortical responses to pitch errors heard in auditory feedback regarding ongoing vocalizations. During the production of a sustained vowel, participants briefly heard their vocal pitch shifted up 2 semitones while they actively attended to auditory or visual events (selective attention), or both auditory and visual events (divided attention), or were not told to attend to either modality (control condition). The behavioral results showed that attending to the pitch perturbations elicited larger vocal compensations than attending to the visual stimuli. Moreover, ERPs were likewise sensitive to the attentional manipulations: P2 responses to pitch perturbations were larger when participants attended to the auditory stimuli compared to when they attended to the visual stimuli, and compared to when they were not explicitly told to attend to either the visual or auditory stimuli. By contrast, dividing attention between the auditory and visual modalities caused suppressed P2 responses relative to all the other conditions, and enhanced N1 responses relative to the control condition. These findings provide strong evidence for the influence of attention on the mechanisms underlying the auditory-vocal integration in the processing of pitch feedback errors. As well, selective attention and divided attention appear to modulate the neurobehavioral processing of pitch feedback errors in different ways. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print