SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Familiar A, Uddenberg S, Shim WM. J. Vis. 2015; 15(12): 450.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology)

DOI

10.1167/15.12.450

PMID

26326138

Abstract

Positive mood has been shown to both broaden the scope of visual attention (Rowe, Hirsh & Anderson, 2006), and facilitate a broad or narrow focus depending on whichever mode is currently dominant (Huntsinger, Clore & Bar-Anan, 2010). Here we investigate whether positive affect influences the spatial extent of peripheral feature integration. Using short film clips to induce positive (happy), negative (fear), and neutral affect, we measured the effect of visual crowding in each mood condition. A Gabor patch (diameter: 1o, eccentricity: 8o) surrounded by six equally spaced 'flanker' Gabors (diameter: 1o) at one of eight possible distances (1.5o, 2o, 2.5o, 3o, 3.5o, 4o, 4.5o, 5o) from the central patch was briefly presented in the right visual field. Subjects' task was to report whether the central patch was tilted left or right of the vertical meridian, and the detection threshold was measured at each flanker distance. Average critical spacing across subjects was significantly smaller when in a positive mood compared to both neutral and negative conditions, which did not significantly differ. Thus, under positive affect the spatial scope of feature integration was narrowed, allowing for better identification of a crowded feature in the periphery. This supports the notion that positive affect influences the spatial envelope of attention in a flexible manner (Huntsinger, 2013), and modulates this scope depending on the default mode necessitated by current task demands. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print