Citation

Linares D, Holcombe AO. Iperception 2014; 5(6): 559-571.

Affiliation

School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; e-mail: alex.holcombe@sydney.edu.au.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1068/i0675

PMID

26034565

PMCID

PMC4441030

Abstract

Differences in perceptual latency (ΔL) for two stimuli, such as an auditory and a visual stimulus, can be estimated from temporal order judgments (TOJ) and simultaneity judgments (SJ), but previous research has found evidence that ΔL estimated from these tasks do not coincide. Here, using an auditory and a visual stimulus we confirmed this and further show that ΔL as estimated from duration judgments also does not coincide with ΔL estimated from TOJ or SJ. These inconsistencies suggest that each judgment is subject to different processes that bias ΔL in different ways: TOJ might be affected by sensory interactions, a bias associated with the method of single stimuli and an order difficulty bias; SJ by sensory interactions and an asymmetrical criterion bias; duration judgments by an order duration bias.

Language: en