Citation

Strasheim J. Civ. Wars 2016; 18(1): 25-44.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/13698249.2016.1144494

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Why did the Ukraine's 2004 Orange Revolution initiate a peaceful democratic transition, while the 2014 protests were followed by violent conflict? This article complements previous studies on Russia's role in Ukraine by focusing on domestic explanations of the recent violence. It shows that structural factors were already conducive to violence in 2004, making it fruitful to analyse the role of agency to explain the 2014 conflict. It demonstrates that while the 2004 transition introduced power-sharing guarantees that mitigated commitment problems for the relevant parties, the 2014 transition saw no such guarantees, making violence a rational strategy for the pro-Russian separatists.

Language: en