Citation

Grimland M, Apter A, Kerkhof A. Crisis 2006; 27(3): 107-118.

Affiliation

Feinberg Child Study Center, Schneider's Children's Medical Center of Israel, Sackler School of Medicine, University of Tel Aviv, Israel.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, International Association for Suicide Prevention, Publisher Hogrefe Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

17091820

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on the phenomenon of suicide bombing. It addresses the question of just how much a psychological understanding of the individuals involved can aid in prevention. The article looks at historical, epidemiological, and cultural perspectives and compares the nonpsychological and psychological approaches to suicide bombing. On the basis of the material available it seems that social processes such as group-dynamic indoctrination and political factors are decisive in analyzing this problem. Cultural, nationalistic, and religious factors are important. The conclusion is that in suicidal bombing, suicide is instrumental in the context of war, not in the context of psychopathology. Suicide bombing is instrumental in realizing fatalities, and it is only one of many weapons. The act of killing in warfare is more important to understanding suicidal terrorism than the act of suicide. This explains why psychological profiling of suicidal terrorists has to date not been successful.

Language: en