SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Adomaitis AD, Johnson KKP. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2005; 23(2): 88.

Affiliation

California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA; University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN USA

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, International Textile and Apparel Association, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0887302X0502300203

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Flight attendants were required to wear a casual uniform consisting of khakis and t-shirts in place of a formal one consisting of a suit. Within a year, management eliminated the casual uniform and returned to the formal uniform. The purpose of our research was to investigate whether type of uniform (formal versus casual) worn influenced flight attendants' role enactment and self-perceptions at work and in what ways, if any, the change to a casual uniform affected employee relationships with peers and passengers. Interview data were gathered from 37 flight attendants who experienced the switch from a formal to a casual uniform and then back again. Participants were asked to reflect on their experiences with co-workers and customers, as well as to reflect on their own perceptions and behaviors while wearing the formal and casual uniforms. Data were analyzed using the line-by-line approach (Van Manen, 1990). Flight attendants' behavior, self-perceptions, and feelings about their ability to carry out their role as flight attendants, as well as their perceived treatment by others were altered when wearing a casual uniform as compared to wearing a formal uniform.  Among the issues investigated were flight attendant feelings about the fire safety of formal uniforms and the differences in passenger perception of the attendant as an authority figure when wearing different uniforms.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print