SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Sances A, Kumaresan S. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2001; 37: 423-427.

Affiliation

Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, Instrument Society of America)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11347428

Abstract

The anthropometric hybrid III dummy test device is the most widely used physical model to assess the injury severity during automotive crashes. The dummy was designed to replicate the human neck in flexion and frontal impacts. Various investigators have compared the dummy neck with living human and cadaveric responses in frontal impacts. However, the comparison between the whole body human cadaver and dummy under an inverted drop is currently lacking. This study was designed to review the exiting data and obtain the comparative data between the human cadaver and the dummy. The vertical whole body cadaver drops from our laboratory and literature have been used. There exists a wide variation between the human and dummy neck responses. The dummy neck was approximately two to four times stiffer under axial compression in the quasi-static or in the dynamic mode. The present comparison will provide a basis to better design the anthropometric dummies in order to obtain an improved injury assessment during inverted drops.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print