Citation

Inman VW, Katz BJ, Hanscom FR. Transp. Res. Rec. 2006; 1973: 18-26.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The focus of this study was on navigational signage that is intended to assist motorists with anticipating the correct roundabout exit and selecting an appropriate approach lane for that exit The objective was to support recommendations on double-lane roundabout signage for FHWA's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Team and the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD). The Traffic Control Devices Pooled Fund Study identified the need for this research. Four navigation signing methods that are currently in use were evaluated. Volunteer participants were shown guide signs and markings in a roundabout context and were asked to identify which lane they should be in and which exit they should use for a given destination. Response correctness, speed, and confidence for lane choices and leg identifications were assessed. Overall, the conventional and diagrammatic signs yielded the best performance, particularly for the participants' reaction times and decision confidence. The current NCUTCD markings subcommittee's recommendations for lane control markings were used in the contextual stimuli presented to the participants. For all navigation sign types, lane selection performance was less than 70% correct and not far from the results obtained by chance, given the assumption that in the absence of other information drivers would use the left lane for left turns, the right lane for right turns, and either lane to continue straight through. Further research is recommended to determine whether the current recommended markings are sufficient for driver comprehension.

Language: en