Citation

Filio D, Dony L, Gonzalez D, Olive M. Accid. Reconstr. J. 2019; 29(5): 12-14.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Accident Reconstruction Journal)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Driving simulators are frequently used to analyze driver behavior during hazard response scenarios. Simulations are often projected using computers or wrap around screens, which can be costly and can require large spaces. Head mounted displays (HMDs) are increasingly becoming an alternative to wrap around screens due to their smaller size and cost effectiveness. This study compares the effects of wrap around screens versus commercially available HMDs on driver response in a driving simulator during unexpected pedestrian crossings. Perception-response time, brake movement time, standard deviation of lateral vehicle position and vehicle speed serve as the measured variables. Among the study's findings are significant differences in perception response time between wrap around screens and HMDs.

Language: en

Keywords

Traffic safety; Reaction time; Driver performance; Driving simulators; Pedestrian movement; Screens